[This piece may be reposted if Asia Times Online is credited and a link provided.]
In other words, it’s time for the United States to engage in
a full-throated celebration of the pivot to Asia with what I think is going to
be President Obama’s America F*ck Yeah tour of Asian democracies in April 2014.
The trip requires more than a little spadework, given the
rather fraught situation in Asia.
It’s not just that the PRC and the Japan are at each other’s
throats and the Philippines has declared that the South China Sea is the new
Sudetenland, and the PRC must be met with confrontation, not negotiation. It’s that the United States is less than
completely happy with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s sharp elbows and the
fractures they create in the pivot’s united front.
There has been a fascinating flurry of op-eds in US prestige
media (Bloomberg, NY Times, Washington Post, and Business Week) highly critical
of Abe and his provocative visit to the Yasukuni Shrine…
…a visit that took place in December 2013. Concerned chin-stroking end-February 2014 is
a little late, it would seem.
And for that matter, the highly insulting detail that Prime
Minister Abe listened to Joe Biden’s importunities for an hour before blowing
him off and visiting the shrine…that was leaked end January.
So why, all of a sudden, does the US have its knickers in a
knot concerning last year’s display of Abe’s rather unambiguous
historical-revisionist inclinations?
Well, reading the exclusive China Matters divinatory
entrails (paywalled! Just kidding) I believe this furor has much to do with
President Obama’s announced visit to Asia.
As of now, the PR China is not on the itinerary. But Japan and the Philippines are. So is South Korea, reportedly after some
strenuous lobbying.
The trip looks like a celebration of the pivot, that
China-containment strategy that dares not speak its name but is meant to secure
America’s leading position in East Asia by pushing China’s relations with its
neighbors in a more polarized and confrontational condition that plays into US
military superiority.
More than that, it will make up for ground lost by the
dismaying cancellation of President Obama’s previous Asia trip (because of the
US debt ceiling farce) and demonstrate to a dubious world that, appearances to
the contrary, the United States is still brimming with resolve, the master of
events, leader of the coalition of Asian democracies, indeed the universally
hailed hegemon of Asia.
I look at President Obama’s trip like one of those imperial
tours favored by the Roman and Chinese emperors to demonstrate that the
empire’s writ still ran in the borderlands.
However, a certain Asian democracy is openly hedging its
bets against the day that the United States changes its mind and decides that
its true interests lie somewhere more along the dreaded G2 axis (cooperation
between the US and the PRC to order affairs in ways not necessarily to the
liking of the other nations of the Pacific.)
That nation, of course, is Japan.
Prime Minister Abe, thanks to his lineage and his personal
experience, is in a good position to remember the many times when the United
States decided that US and Japanese interests did not necessarily coincide.
They include slights as old as the Portsmouth Treaty (when
Teddy Roosevelt decided that Japan was too green a member of the imperial club
to enjoy the full fruits of its victory over Tsarist Russia) to that whole
World War II unpleasantness (which Abe’s revisionist group consider to be
entirely the fault of the United States), to the sudden recognition of the PRC,
the torpedoing of the Japanese economy by the Plaza Accord imposed by the
United States, and the unnerving undertone of G2 chatter that occasionally
pervades US diplomacy.
On a personal level, Prime Minister Abe undoubtedly also
remembers how he loyally supported George W. Bush’s confrontational North Korea
policy in 2005, only to see Japan—and Abe’s signature issue, the abductees—brushed
aside in Chris Hill & Condoleezza Rice’s haste to conclude a transitory
agreement with the DPRK.
On a happier note, Prime Minister Abe probably also recalls
that Secretary Clinton was a staunch opponent of G2 and an avid supporter of
the Asia pivot, with the underlying strategy of employing the alliance with
Japan as the keystone of US policy in Asia.
The full story perhaps needs an entire book, but it is worth remembering
that President Obama was reportedly prepared to drop the affirmation of the
Senkakus as falling under the US-Japan security treaty —presumably in response to some Chinese blandishment—until the tag team of
Secretary Clinton and Minister Maehara exploited (or, in my view, concocted)
the whole 2010 Senkaku Captain Zhan/rare earth imbroglio
that led to the exact opposite outcome—open affirmation that the Senkakus were
covered.
Subsequently, it became clear that Secretary
Clinton had decided to ditch engagement and treat the PRC’s maritime issues as
a pretext for a confrontainment policy against China, and use the policy as the
foundation of the militarized pivot to Asia.
But Secretary Clinton is gone, at least for the time being,
and the decidedly less confrontational John Kerry seems to have been able to
take the reins of US diplomacy.
Kerry’s focus on the Middle East has occasioned
nervous/resentful mumblings from supporters of the Japan relationship in
Washington, for the stated reason that his focus on the Far East is
insufficient and the pivot is languishing.
An unstated reason may be that the PRC, because of its somewhat
important role in Iran and Syria matters, may be inching toward a quasi-G2
relationship with Kerry that might result in some favors being done for the PRC
at the expense of the pivot democracies.
One such favor, I previously speculated, might have been the
US demand that Japan demonstrate its nuclear non-proliferation sincerity by returning some weapons grade plutonium it had received from the United States a long time ago.
In any case, I felt that it was necessary for Kerry to
establish his tough-on-China credentials, and I believe he did that by sendingout Evan Madeiros to make a big noise about how the US would not tolerate a
South China Sea ADIZ. And the PRC, which, I believe, had
already disclaimed any current intention for an SCS ADIZ, promptly said they
were considering no such move, thereby allowing Kerry to shift, albeit
incrementally, out of the despised Chamberlain-appeasement doghouse into the
blessed realm of Churchillian resolve.
So President Obama can go to Asia secure in the knowledge
that America’s “stick a thumb in China’s eye” credentials are relatively
secure.
With this context, what to make of the concerted campaign to
rain on Prime Minister Abe’s parade re Yasukuni?
I think it’s because President Obama wants to use his April
trip to affirm the pivot and, more importantly, the indispensable US leadership
role in it.
That means cracking the whip on Japan and demonstrating that
the US will not allowed itself to get tangled up in the Abe administration’s
hopes and dreams for a Japan that is able to exploit the US alliance as an
element in its own plans to restore Japan’s sovereignty and military and
diplomatic clout in Asia.
It would take a special kind of denial to ignore the fact
that Prime Minister Abe is abubble with plans to expand Japan’s diplomatic and
security footprint in Asia all the way from the Kuriles to Myanmar and India …or to disregard the fact that these ambitions do not fit cleanly within a
hierarchical structure with the US pivot on top, with the US-Japan security
alliance as the next layer, and Japan’s relationship with the other Asian
democracies guided by the pivot, the security alliance, and the power and the
glory of American strategic vision.
This unpleasant state of affairs is demonstrated by the
conundrum that seems to underlay the Abe-bashing: the growing rift between
South Korea and Japan.
One of the nagging problems of the pivot has been the rancor
between the Abe and Park administrations, and also South Korea’s un-pivoty
predilection for sidling over into the PRC economic and diplomatic camp.
Abe, contrary to the ostensible doctrine of pivot
solidarity, seems happy to determinedly and systematically exacerbate the bad
blood between Japan and South Korea, not just with Yasukuni but with dismissive
remarks by his allies on the lessons of World War II and the comfort
women. And, contrary to the idea that
the United States coordinates the pivot, Abe has also been most dismissive of
US efforts to insert itself in the dispute.
According to Peter Ennis of Japan Dispatch, the Yasukuni kerfuffle played out as part of the
U.S. effort to mediate a rapprochement between Japan and South Korea.
Per Ennis, Vice President Biden thought he had an
understanding that Abe would not visit Yasukuni and communicated that
perception to President Park. When it
transpired that Abe was indeed planning to visit Yasukuni, Biden made the
infamous phone call to try to persuade him not to go, and Abe in essence told
him to get stuffed.
Not only did he tell Biden to get stuffed, Abe apparently
personally leaked the details of this embarrassment to one of his favorite
papers, according to Ennis:
(Insiders in Tokyo, citing the close ties between Sankei and Abe, believe the account of the conversation comes directly from Abe himself – an assessment shared by key US officials.)
In their conversation, Biden said to Abe: “I told President Park that ‘I don’t think Mr. Abe will visit Yasukuni Shrine.’ If you indicate you will not visit the shrine, I think Ms. Park will agree to meet you.’”
Abe has long been incensed about what he considers American hectoring against his nationalist convictions, and he told Biden that he intended to visit Yasukuni at some point.
Immediately after Prime Minister Abe maliciously leaked the
intelligence that he had spurned Vice President Biden’s appeal to give
satisfaction to President Park on the Yasukuni issue, a thunderous op-ed delivered
by the concentrated firepower of Richard Armitage, Victor Cha, and Michael
Green appeared in the Washington Post calling for President Obama to visit
Seoul…
… and it was subsequently announced that South Korea had
been added to the itinerary and Japan would not be acting as North Asia’s
exclusive host for the Obama visit.
Take that!
Now, in addition to Abe’s desire to trample on the feelings
of Biden and Park to wave his freak flag high on the issue of his nationalist
revisionist beliefs, I think there were a few other forces at work.
First of all, as I’ve argued elsewhere, Abe does not have a
comfortable relationship with the Obama administration. His US avatar is Dick Cheney, with whom Abe
tried to coordinate a China-containment policy during his first term, and his natural allies are the US Republican right wing and
pro-Japan/anti-China hawks in the US security and defense establishment.
I think the pointed and public humiliation of Biden was a
signal from Abe that he was not under the thumb of the White House, and his
allies in the United States could take advantage of the Obama administration’s embarrassment
to question the efficacy and execution of the administration’s Japan policy
(and its effort to steer a middle course between the PRC & Japan), and lobby
for the further evolution of US policy in Asia toward openly Japan-centric
doctrine of deterrence and confrontation with the PRC.
Second, the ROK and Japan are direct peer competitors in
Asia. When ROK President Lee Myung-bak
was in charge, he openly tried to seize the mantle of Asian leadership (and
American ally numero uno) from Japan, which was flailing through its non-LDP
interregnum. Abe, with his nationalist
inclinations, is distinctly hostile to Korean presumption.
If one wants to play the deep game, Japan no less than the
PRC fears Korean reunification and the emergence of an Asian democracy that
might dwarf Japan in economic and national vigor. One of the less reported stories is Abe’s
continual game of footsie with North Korea, with clandestine meetings between
Japanese and DPRK diplomats and, in addition, the offer of Switzerland (and I
suspect, India) to put their good offices at Japan’s disposal for mediation.
The ostensible context for this back and forth is to obtain
closure on the miserable issue of the Japanese abductees; but I suspect the
real objective is to achieve some sort of direct rapprochement with North Korea
that will give Japan the direct inside track, ditch the PRC-led Five Party
Talks regime, wrongfoot the US, PRC, and South Korea in the impending dash for
North Korea’s under-developed mineral and human resources…and keep the DPRK
alive and the peninsula comfortably split.
In other words, South Korea is welcome to explore its
options as a continental power within the PRC’s sphere of influence, using
Shandong as its cheap labor hinterland instead of northern Korea. Japan will be happy to eat South Korea’s
lunch in maritime, democratic Asia, thank you very much.
Third, as Abe works to recover Japan’s full military,
defense, and security sovereignty, he has no interest in the United States
arrogating to itself the privilege of setting Japan’s regional diplomatic
agenda. If anything, it looks like Abe
wants to have extensive engagement with the United States, but he wants in the
context of peer-to-peer bilateral relations negotiated through explicit
mechanisms like the security alliance and the TPP. His vision for the US-Japan relationship
certainly does not entail listening to Joe Biden and the Obama administration’s
brainstorms about Asia, especially when they are intended to demonstrate
America’s honest-broker cred i.e. attempt to show the ROK and the PRC that the
US can constrain Japan’s behavior in a meaningful way.
Abe has gone along with the United States on two rather
dismal initiatives that the Pentagon adores—collective self defense and Futenma
relocation. Therefore, by his lights, he probably
thinks the United States should, as a matter of mutual respect and alliance
loyalty to America’s most important partner in Asia, put up with the crap he
wants to dish out to the PRC and South Korea (parenthetically, the Obama
administration pointedly did not go as far as Abe in instructing civilian
carriers to disregard the ECS ADIZ, which was, by one perspective a matter of
supreme moderation and common sense but, from Abe’s perspective, left him out
on a limb looking a bit stupid—but also gave him a pretext to complain about
equivocal US backing as a justification for Japan’s growing independence in
security policy).
I believe that, as I’ve predicted for the last year or so, the pivot chickens are now, inevitably coming home to roost. The decision to hype the PRC maritime
threat has encouraged the frontline Asian democracies, especially Japan, to a
point that US leadership is on the cusp of overt challenge.
Japan, the ROK, and the PRC may be well aware of US
intentions, but are less convinced of US capabilities in delivering on the
promise of a unified, carefully managed and modulated pivot strategy that
empowers the US through a militarized containment strategy against the PRC, while
preserving the honest broker role for the US and stifling the
independent-minded initiatives of the frontline pivot allies.
Instead, it appears that Japan, especially, is quietly going
rogue and will do its best to exploit the pivot to pursue its own regional
agendas while calling on the US for the support at crunch time which, as the
pivot advocate, it must perforce deliver.
So instead of the implacable united front against the PRC
that is the raison d’etre of the pivot, we have an alliance in flux, deterrent
that is equivocal and ripe for testing by the PRC, and increasingly close and
tense encounters in the maritime zone.
In other words, a recipe for…something, not sure what, but
certainly not peace, stability, and shared prosperity that Hillary Clinton
promised to deliver with the pivot.
Japan is sufficiently invested in the US relationship to
support the alliance and even the Obama administration as it begins its long
but inevitable descent into lame-duck status.
But meticulously orchestrated American announcements,
initiatives, and trips to Asia can only do so much as Japan, and Asian allies
that increasingly look to Japan for regional leadership, see the need and
benefits of going their own separate ways.
They say the sun doesn’t rise because the rooster
crows. But in this case it did. I think
President Obama is learning that the sun did rise because the rooster crowed
i.e. that Japanese assertiveness is a direct consequence of the empowerment of
the hawkish establishment in Japan by the US pivot doctrine.
Trouble is, now that the sun is rising, it looks like it will
keep rising on its own.
And there’s little that the rooster can do about it.
