Saturday, December 06, 2014

Pale Horse, Pale Rider: Death and Horses in Ukraine

Khrushchev Remembers, an autobiographical overview of the USSR supremo’s life, although a ripping good read that also offers a timely insider’s view of the consolidation of Stalinist rule in Ukraine is, rather surprisingly, out of print  [A three volume memoir has been published by Penn State University Press through the efforts of Khrushchev's son, Sergei.  See endnote].  

Well, maybe not so surprisingly.

According to Victor Marchetti*, the ex- Special Assistant to the Deputy Director of the CIA who penned the bombshell CIA and the Cult of Intelligence back in 1974 (which was published with black bars showing the 168 redactions demanded by the CIA) and led to the establishment of the Church Committee, the publication of Khrushchev Remembers was a rather complicated put-up job orchestrated by the CIA and the KGB.

In 2001, Marchetti wrote:  

Perhaps the most startling example of the ClA's manipulation of the publishing world is the case of Khrushchev Remembers. Khrushchev is still widely believed to have been the author. He is supposed to have dashed it off one summer and then said to himself, "Where will I get this published? Ah! Time-Life!" The tapes reached Time-Life, we all read it, and we told ourselves, "Isn't that interesting."
A little thought should be sufficient to dispel the notion that the KGB would allow Khrushchev to sit in his dacha dictating tape after tape with no interference. He certainly dictated tapes, but the tapes were censored and edited by the KGB, and then a deal was struck between the U.S. and the USSR, after it was decided, at the highest level, that such a book would be mutually beneficial. Brezhnev could use against some of the resistance he was encountering from Stalinist hardliners, and Nixon could use it to increase support for detente.

The CIA and the KGB cooperated in carrying out the operation. The tapes were given to the Time bureau in Moscow. Strobe Talbot, who appears on television frequently today and is Time's bureau chief in Washington, brought the tapes back with him. I was present in an apartment in which he hid them for a couple of days. The tapes were then translated and a manuscript developed. During this period Time refused to let people who had known Khrushchev personally, including White House staff members, listen to the tapes.

Knowledgeable people began to tell me. "I don't believe this." "There's something mighty fishy here." When they read what Khrushchev was supposedly saying, they were even more incredulous. But the book came out, Khrushchev Remembers, accompanied by a massive publicity campaign. It was a great propaganda accomplishment for the CIA and the KGB.

I touched on Khrushchev Remembers in my book. I did not go into any great detail, merely devoting several tentative paragraphs to the affair. Just before my book was published Time was considering doing a two-page spread on me until they learned of my expressed reservations on the trustworthiness of Khrushchev Remembers. I began to get phone calls from Talbot and Jerry Schaechter, then Time's bureau chief in Washington, telling me I should take out the offending passages.

I had written, correctly, that before publication Strobe Talbot had taken the bound transcripts of the Khruschhev tapes back to Moscow, via Helsinki, so that the KGB could make one final review of them. I told Schaechter and Talbot that if they came to me, looked me in the eye, and told me I had the facts wrong, I would take out the section on Khruschhev Remembers. Neither of them ever came by, the paragraphs stayed in my book, and in any event Time went ahead with the two-page spread anyway.

Some food for thought for consumers of the clandestinely recorded and providentially smuggled Zhao Ziyang memoir Prisoner of the State, perhaps.

With these caveats, Khrushchev Remembers is Khrushchev, even if he’s speaking through a KGB/CIA filter.  And some important and interesting historical events are addressed.

One of which is the matter of Dr. Drobotko, as recounted in Khrushchev Remembers.

At the time under discussion, Khrushchev is the recently assigned Ukraine First Party Secretary and Stalin’s chosen instrument for imposing the center’s will on Ukraine, recently brutalized by the death of millions during collectivization, and to bring down the curtain on the feisty and independent and soon to be literally extinct native Ukrainian Communists.  Then there’s the complication of thousands of dying horses, perhaps poisoned by aggrieved Ukrainians (killing of horses was considered an important element of resistance to collectivization) or even saboteurs in collusion with Hitler:

[In 1939 we] immediately found ourselves up against a dangerous problem.  Horses were dropping dead on farms all over the western section of the Ukraine, along the Polish border…During a visit to a collective farm…I asked a stable attendant if he had any idea why the horses were dying like flies.  

He told me that the horses were being poisoned:

“I saw this man administering poison to the horses,” he said, “so we grabbed him and turned him in.  And you know what he turned out to be?  A veterinarian!”

This was plausible enough.  We figured that the Germans…might be trying to sabotage our economy and our military capabilities [As Edward Cruikshank points out in a footnote, the Red Army literally ran on horsepower until the Allies started delivering motorized vehicles during World War II—ed].

I asked Uspensky [People’s Commissar for Internal Affairs in Ukraine—ed], “Do you still have in jail any of the men who were caught poisoning horses?”

…He named some professor at the Kharkov Veterinary Institute, a Jew, and the director of the Kharkov Institute of Animal Husbandry, a Ukrainian.

…”Call them into your office, will you?”

“What’s the use?  They’ve already confessed to the NKVD that they’re saboteurs and German agents…”

I went to the NKVD and the Jewish professor, a gray-haired man of about fifty, was brought to me.
“Well, what do you have to say for yourself?”

“I’ve already given two testimonies and I can only confirm what I said there.  Yes, we’re German agents and we were given an assignment to poison horses.”
I wasn’t satisfied…I decided to set up a commission to look into the mysterious deaths of all the horses.  I was faced with a problem here, too, because there had already been several such commissions, and when the horses kept on dying, the commissions had been dissolved and their members arrested and eliminated.  Therefore, with some justification, it was widely thought that an appointment to serve on one of those commissions sealed a man’s fate.

Khrushchev calls in the president of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Aleksandr Bogomolets.  (Interesting current events sidebar: A. Bogomolets was the great grandfather of Olga Bogomolets, the “Chief Physician” or “Angel” of the Maidan who reputedly offered the much contested observation that snipers at Maidan were shooting police as well protesters in February 2014 that was referenced in the Paett-Ashton phone call.) 

A. Bogomolets, after some LBJ-style armtwisting by Khrushchev, glumly agrees to chair an investigatory commission so that other colleagues will not be too afraid to participate.  To provide greater assurance that the investigation is successful and less of a death trap, Khrushchev tells Bogomolets he’ll set up a second commission to “double the chances of one commission’s coming up with the answer.”

I actually had another reason for proposing two parallel commissions.  I wasn’t excluding the possibility that there were saboteurs about, and I was hoping that if a saboteur got on one of the commissions, the other commission would be made up of honest men…

Just to be absolutely safe, we added a third commission made up of Russian scientists from Moscow, headed by Professor Vertinsky…

Sometime later one of the Ukrainian commissions, Professor Dobrotko’s,  came to the conclusion that the horses were being made sick by a fungus which grew in wet hay.

“When I realized this must be the cause,” Comrade Dobrotko told me, “I even contaminated myself with the fungus…and I came down with an illness very similar to the one which is killing the horses.”

Professor Vertinsky wasn’t willing to accept Dobrotko’s conclusions.  Vertinsky was a Muscovite, and Dobrotko was a Ukrainian.  At that time the difference was still very significant…finally Vertinsky informed me that he had agreed with Dobrotko’s findings…The recommended method for stamping out the disease was simply—keep hay dry.

Stalin had been following the whole affair closely…Professor Dobrotko was awarded the Order of the Laborers’ Red Banner.  In my opinion he deserved the Order of Lenin…

We had won more than just a victory for our agriculture.  It was a moral and political victory as well.  But how many collective farm chairmen, cattle raisers, agronomists, animal husbandry specialists, and scientists had lost their heads as saboteurs before I stepped in and took charge of the situation? [pp 111-114]

How many, indeed?

There is a certain amount of black comedy in Khrushchev’s account of his skillful conduct of scientific forensics a la Stalin with a triple-commission pirouette, albeit skillful perhaps only in forestalling the arrest and execution of the scientists until the truth could be uncovered.

But of course, it was not at all funny to the Ukrainians involved, including Dr. Drobotko (1885-1966) whom, attentive readers will have noticed, is consistently misidentified as “Dr. Dobrotko” in the US edition of Khurshchev Remembers.  To further complicate matters, modern references drop the Russian-language “Viktor Grigorevich Drobotko” in favor of the Ukrainian “Viktor Hryhorovych Drobot’ko”.

There are tantalizing traces of Dr. Drobotko and the horse-death crisis in the English-language historical record.

The Ukraine outbreak was apparently an ongoing, extensive, and self-perpetuating problem affecting horses throughout the west of Ukraine, “enzooitic” as they say in the epidemiology biz.  It was first reported in 1931 (8 years before Khrushchev convened his multiple commissions) and killed thousands of horses due to gastrointestinal bleeding and neurological complications. 

It also emerged in the shadow of the brutal collectivization movement, whose combination of utopianism, malice, incompetence, and mass starvation was eerily recapitulated in Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward.  

Stalin's exercise in coercive agricultural planning saw Ukraine’s number of horses collapse as farmers slaughtered their horses either out of defiance of the collectivization movement or because ownership of livestock was a clear and fatal indicator of kulak status.  The lack of equine draught power, in turn, exacerbated the agricultural dislocations brought on by collectivization.  As the famine tightened its grip, more horses starved to death for lack of forage or were killed for food.

It is estimated that Ukraine lost half its horses—a decline of over two million head—during the 1930s, making the issue of persistent, widespread, and unexplained death of horses on Ukraine’s border with Poland a matter of strategic and political concern.

In his memoir, Khrushchev passes over the gigantic horse hecatomb of the worst years of the 1930s (during which time he was working under Stalin in Moscow), let alone the millions of people killed in the famine.  Instead, he seems to be angling for some credit for resisting the urge to continue purging Ukrainians over the horse mystery, and allowing Dr. Drobotko to trace the problem to its scientific roots.  [I suppose Stalin & Khrushchev might have been trying to explain away Ukraine's missing horse problem by blaming it on the disease uncovered by Dr. Drobotko.  However, it seems to have been presented as a local problem in western Ukraine, while the horse shortage was Ukraine-wide, indeed nation-wide.  CH 12/8/2014]

The culprit discovered by Dr. Drobotko was Stachybotris mold, and he coined the term “stachybotryotoxicosis” to describe the poisoning symptoms caused by the mold’s toxins.  

Horses that consume large quantities of the mold in wet hay essentially have their GI tract eroded by the toxin, hemorrhage extensively, and die quite unpleasantly.  Humans can also be sickened, usually by aspirating the mold (it is one possible culprit in the “sick building” i.e. fungal contamination syndrome) or handling contaminated hay, and display respiratory and/or dermatological distress.  

I wonder how much mold Dr. Drobotko had to consume, if any, to test his theory.  According to the official record, Drobotko’s team proceeded in the old-fashioned scientific way.  After feeding horses with stachybotris-infected hay and seeing them get sick, Drobotko confirmed the hypothesis by growing the mold on agar dishes and feeding the pure mold to horses in escalating quantities with correspondingly dire results.  Human experimentation was perhaps confined to duplicating the dermatological rashes that agricultural workers had experienced by rubbing mold on researchers’ forearms and experiencing similar outcomes. (Joseph Forgacs, “Stachybotryotoxicosis”, in Microbial Toxins, ed. S. Kadis et al.)

Maybe Dr. Drobotko ingested or applied the mold to test its effects; or maybe he believed he had a lock on the cause but needed to engage (or pretend to engage) in self-experimentation in order to impress Khrushchev with the strength of his scientific convictions and socialist loyalty.

In any event, although Dr. Vertinsky managed to hog much of the scientific glory, Dr. Drobotko’s achievement was acknowledged at the national level and his research received attention in the West after World War II as his article on stachybotrytoxicosis was published in English in the American Review of Soviet Medicine.  

His entry in a USSR biographical dictionary published in 1958 and based on the work of German researchers lists his achievements and also confirms that the equine stachyotryotoxicosis crisis was indeed a big deal, scientifically and politically:

DROBOTKO, Viktor Grigorevich. Microbiologist and epidemiologist; Doctor of Medical Sciences; full member, Ukrainian supervisor, Microbiology Institute, Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences.

Born 1885, Dekhtyary, now Sumy Oblast. Grad. 1913 Medical Faculty, Kiev University; 1914-25 zemstvo doctor in Romny, now in Poltava Oblast; 1925-31 assistant, Kiev Bacteriology Institute; 1931 became scientific associate and 1938 director and scientific supervisor, Zabolotny Microbiology and Epidemiology Institute, Kiev (now Microbiology Institute, Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences); 1948 elected full member, Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences; member, editorial council, journal "Antibiotiki;" author, about 100 works in the field of microbiology and epidemiology, dealing with the typhoid-enteric group of bacteria, rhinoscleroma, bacteriophages, dysentery, vaccination, the chemotherapy of infectious diseases, etc.; with other scientists defined the etiology of human and equine stachybotryotoxicosis, caused by the fungus stachybotrys alternans; in the USSR this disease was formerly considered the result of deliberate [sabotage] infection of horses and human beings which led, in 1937, to mass arrests of veterinary surgeons and bacteriologists; produced a new vegetable antibiotic "Imanin;" Order of Lenin; Order of Red Banner of Labor; medals.

Drobotko became Director of the Institute of Microbiology of the Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences in 1944.

However, he was not out of the woods, as the distinguished Soviet geneticist S.M. Gershenson revealed in passing in his survey of the horrors Lysenkoism had meted out to Soviet sciences, not just genetics but also microbiology as well as other fields:

In these times [apparently the 1950s—ed.] there appeared in micro-biology a theory proposed by G. I. Boshian, and strongly supported by Lysenko and his patrons. Boshian asserted that under certain specific conditions viruses may become transformed into bacteria, or the reverse. On the basis of this theory he advocated drastic changes in modern medicine, in particular in micro- biology and epidemiology. Had these ideas been realized in practice, they would have done great harm to many people. True scientists who tried to criticize Boshian's ideas were severely attacked in the press as enemies of Michurin's [Lysenko-supported graft hybridization] biology. Professor B. G. Drobotko of Kiev was among those who suffered. Boshian's doctrine was officially included in microbiology courses in the universities and institutes of the USSR.

After Stalin died, Khrushchev carried on as Lysenko’s patron (Lysenko did not completely fall from grace until Khrushchev was removed in 1964, though he had been progressively sidelined since Stalin’s death thanks to criticism from Soviet scientists pretty much across the board). 

Maybe Khrushchev’s kind words about Drobotko—whose name he doesn’t seem to have remembered properly-- were intended by his KGB and/or CIA amanuensi to rebuke the pretensions of the current crop of neo-Stalinists by reminding the Soviet world of the enormous and irredeemable debacle of Stalin’s support of Lysenko and Stalin’s crimes in Ukraine at the same time.

Drobotko served as Director of his institute until 1962 and published over 160 scientific papers before he died in 1965.  Drobotko’s memory lives on at the microbiology institute in Kyiv, now renamed the D.K. Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology in honor of its founder.

It is clear that Drobotko is regarded as a major figure in the survival and development of Ukrainian science during the Soviet period.  The Institute’s history webpage states:

In 1937 it was a target of national significance to reveal the etiology of the disease that had caused mass loss of horses in the western areas of Ukraine and Belarus. The task had been set to the scientists of our Institute: P. Marusenko (Director, Head of the team), V. Drobotko (Scientific Supervisor), and microbiologists P. Yatel, D. Kudlai, B. Eisenman, M. Kolesnyk, M. Pidoplichko and B. Kagan. The complex approach to solve this task gave positive results the following year: the causes of the disease were established, and the disease itself was liquidated. On February 12, 1939, all the above scientists were awarded with orders for their success. It was the first case of rewarding the Ukrainian scientists with high state decorations.

The Institute website also has a picture of Drobotko and his team from a contemporary news article commemorating their success in licking the equine stachybotrytoxicosis problem.  Dr. Drobotko is second from the left in the front row. 

I believe a full retelling of Dr. Drobotko’s career would illuminate the violence, resistance, and suffering that permeated Ukraine during the Soviet era and perhaps commemorate some of the victims by giving names and faces and history to the scientists, bureaucrats, and agriculturalists—most if not all Ukrainians, I assume—who perished during the wave of paranoia that answered the inexplicable equine outbreak.  And a description of Dr. Drobotko’s struggles and achievements would preserve the history of efforts to restore dignity, normalcy, and continuity to science in Ukraine.

Well, somebody might tell this epic story, but it’s not going to be me, I’m afraid.  The Zabalotny Institute—where, I believe, Dr. Drobotko’s papers are held—distracted, no doubt by the demands of science and the exigencies of the current crisis, did not respond to my repeated contacts by e-mail.


Anyway, it’s a story that should and, I hope, will be told in full.


*  Victor Marchetti has been through the reputational meatgrinder thanks to the hostility of the CIA and Howard Hunt, who sued Marchetti for stating that Hunt had been in Dallas the day JFK was assassinated.

However, a couple of points support Marchetti’s allegations concerning Khrushchev Remembers.  First, the book hasn’t been republished or kept in print, shielding it from fresh critical appraisal.  Second, in Khrushchev’s account of the Cuban Missile Crisis, he (or his minders) tactfully omit the secret detail that Kennedy agreed to remove Jupiter missiles from Turkey as part of the climbdown.

[Update: I am grateful to S. Bayer for pointing out in the comments the reason Khrushchev Remembers is out print is because it was superseded by a three-volume memoir published by Penn State University Press through the efforts of Khurshchev's son, Sergei.  Apparently, Marchetti was spot on concerning at least the KGB's role in getting the tapes to the West.  According to a review of Volume 1 of the memoirs by Hiroaki Kuromiya of Indiana University, the tapes & transcripts were spirited out of the USSR by Viktor Louis. "Given his extraordinary and suspicious reach both within the Kremlin and the Soviet Union and beyond the Soviet border, Louis has been suspected of being an operative for the KGB...Sergei implicitly admits in the book that this was the case...He suggests that one arm of the KGB was trying to thwart his efforts...while another was clandestinely helping them...The then chief of the KGB, Yuri Andropov, according to Sergei, took a neutral stance [at first]" Harvard Ukrainian Studies XXVII 1-4, 2004-2005.  CH, 12/7/14]

Marchetti, by the way, claims to have been intimately involved in the intelligence aspects of the Cuban crisis.  He alleges that President Kennedy was well aware that the missiles in Cuba were still lacking their warheads and therefore posed no threat to the United States.  Nevertheless, Kennedy and his hagiographers, perhaps in order to provide America’s youth with sufficient pretext for a frantic pre-apocalypse f*ckfest, have skated over this aspect of the crisis.

[We didn’t] come as close to war as many think, because Khruschev knew he was caught. His missiles weren't armed, and he hadn't the troops to protect them. Kennedy knew this, so he was able to say: "take them out." And Khruschev had to say yes.

Ah, history.  Or, as we say, “Whaddya know?”


The illustration at the head of this post is a painting by Albert Pinkham Ryder, titled The Race Track (Death on a Pale Horse), at the Cleveland Museum of Art.  The museum's description:

Ryder’s subject was inspired by a horse race that took place in New York during 1888. One of the artist’s friends wagered $500 on the race and then committed suicide after the horse lost. Medieval symbolism infuses the composition: death appears as a skeleton on horseback holding a scythe with which he cuts down the living, while a snake-a sign of temptation and evil-slithers in the foreground. An intense man, Ryder worked on the painting for several years [1896-1908--ed.] and was deeply reluctant to part with it.


blowback said...

I thought the Cuban missile crisis was all about the Jupiter missiles in Turkey. Their proximity and resulting destabilization effect was just too dangerous for them to remain so the whole Cuban missile "plot" was a charade to "persuade" Kennedy to remove them. So rather than the Cuban Missile Crisis being a victory for Kennedy, as most Americans believe to this day, it was actually a victory for commonsense and Khrushchev. However, that does not fit in with the views of American exceptionalists, so is ignored.

S.Bayer said...

It is certainly unsurprising that "Khrushchev Remembers" is out of print, since we now have the complete Memoirs in 3 volumes edited by Khrushchev's son Sergei.

China Hand said...

Thanks to S. Bayer for the corrective. According to a review of volume 1 of the memoirs by Hiroaki Kuromiya of Indiana University, the tapes & transcripts were spirited out of the USSR by Viktor Louis. "Given his extraordinary and suspicious reach both within the Kremlin and the Soviet Union and beyond the Soviet border, Louis has been suspected of being an operative for the KGB...Sergei implicitly admits in the book that this was the case...He suggests that one arm of the KGB was trying to thwart his efforts...while another was clandestinely helping them...The then chief of the KGB, Yuri Andropov, according to Sergei, took a neutral stance [at first]" Harvard Ukrainian Studies XXVII 1-4, 2004-2005

Postkey said...

"The CIA and the KGB cooperated in carrying out the operation."

Did the 'West' cooperate with the Soviet Union?

“In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90-95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.
. . . Because 50 years of dealings with the Soviets has been an economic success for the USSR and a political failure for the United States. It has not stopped war, it has not given us peace.
The United States is spending $80 billion a year on defense against an enemy built by the United States and West Europe.
Even stranger, the U.S. apparently wants to make sure this enemy remains in the business of being an enemy.“
“Taken together, these four volumes constitute an extraordinary commentary on a basic weakness in the Soviet system
The Soviets are heavily dependent on Western technology and innovation not only in their civilian industries, but also in their military programs.
An inevitable conclusion from the evidence in this book is that we have totally ignored a policy that would enable us to neutralize Soviet global ambitions while simultaneously reducing the defense budget and the tax load on American citizens.”