Thursday, March 10, 2011

The T Word

The New York Times Misuses and Misremembers the Definition of Torture.

Three BBC correspondents were treated horribly in Libya  by Khadafi forces.  They were beaten, hooded, and subjected to mock executions.

The New York Times headlined its report 3 BBC Journalists Report Being Tortured in Libya.

It's noteworthy, and not in a good way, that the Gray Lady got it wrong.

By international treaty--the Convention Against Torture--"torture" is severe mistreatment applied for the purpose of extracting a confession: "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession."

The purpose of the treaty is to remove physical and mental mistreatment from the menu of permitted prosecutorial techniques, and discourage the formation of a state justice apparatus reliant upon extorted and often false testimony.

The BBC journalists were beaten and terrorized in order to intimidate them, not to extract a confession.

What they endured was "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment"--mistreatment that is specifically exempted from the Convention Against Torture. 

Apparently as long as government incentives to abuse prisoners to extract confessions were removed, the governments that signed the Convention were unwilling to provide the same protections against abuse to detainees if it was motivated by the perceived needs for prison discipline, or as a simple exercise in recreational sadism.

It's also the kind of treatment that is applied ad nauseum in US-run detention facilities overseas.

Bradley Manning is being tortured: he is being mistreated in order to compel him to confess and, presumably, implicate Julian Assange.

The New York Times hasn't deemed it fit to characterize the conditions of Bradley Manning's detention as "torture".

Maybe that's why it's so sloppy with its use of the term.


Random said...

Under the self-important Bill Keller, NYT is turning into a rag.

Glad you've noticed.

Anonymous said...

Uncover not in how with the purpose of act a annul mobile phone lookup otherwise reverse phone lookup telephone lookup before even a telephone number lookup lookup that discover away starting home who is losing with the aim of someone that has been calling you this whole moment ok.

educationalbabytoys said...

Overturn cellular phone search websites similar to this lone force give you all kinds of cellular phone lookup details so with the aim of you be capable of sooner or later locate elsewhere their name, address, where they be alive, reverse phone lookup their current age in addition to a serious deal further. So after you necessitate that finish a cell phone number lookup now, only perform certain to facilitate use this advantageous tool with the intention of locate away all kinds of undo mobile phone search facts losing to being today.

Anonymous said...

I enjoy this nice invert phone lookup otherwise telephone lookup otherwise cell phone number search spot. I can gather a momentous amount of cell phone lookup matter with reference to swap telephone lookup here nowadays at what time I check out this guide here.

Anonymous said...

Splurge this cell phone search place so as soon as to locate elsewhere cell phone lookup is down this mysterious telephone number you have possession of questions on the focus of. Plus today you can consume the same telephone search with the purpose of obtain those answers prepared meant for you at the moment quickly in addition to easily.

Holly Adams said...

This information is beneficial to us, thanks for sharing it. I have just browsed your website and found it to be very interesting and informative. Please visit my profile. Test Webcam Online.